59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental SportContact 7 gegen Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
SportContact 7
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
21
4
18
4
17
7
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
11.9
12.0
6.1
3.8
1.3
4.6
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
165
111
47
36
124
92

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
85%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
86%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Continental SportContact 7
90%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
76%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
62%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
92%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
87%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental SportContact 7
93%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
83%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
84%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
85%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
72%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental SportContact 7
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Continental SportContact 7
70%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
43%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
70%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
67%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Firestone Roadhawk Michelin e.Primacy Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Falken e.Ziex Continental SportContact 7 Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.