57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
21
13
5
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
11.9
4.3
2.8
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
47
165
123
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen