57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
1
28
3
4
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
1.0
2.3
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
27
67
36
40

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich