57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
4
3
4
18
3
Optimale Position
#2
#6
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
9.0
12.0
6.1
1.3
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2025
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
91
111
47
23

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen