57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Semperit
Speed-Life 3
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
4
14
18
10
4
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
18.1
6.1
6.0
12.0
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
116
47
109
111

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich