57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
4
2
3
14
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
12.0
2.0
3.7
3.6
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
123
40
47
111
48
36
194

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich