57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71

Testprofil

Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
4
6
15
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
1.0
6.1
3.3
4.7
9.0
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
66
47
40
146
226

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Handling - nass
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Nassbremsen
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Kreisbahn nass
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Kosten
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Preis-Wert
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Rollwiderstand
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Kilometerstand
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Komfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Außengeräusch
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Komfort
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Trocken
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Trockenbremsen
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Handling - trocken
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Tread pattern comparison

Hankook ION Evo
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen