57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
10
18
1
5
4
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
6.1
1.0
4.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
109
47
27
158
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen