57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Linglong ComfortMaster gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Linglong
ComfortMaster
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
4
4
1
3
Optimale Position
#8
#1
#3
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
8.0
6.1
12.0
3.3
1.0
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
94
47
111
40
66
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Komfort
Linglong ComfortMaster
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Linglong ComfortMaster
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Trocken
Linglong ComfortMaster
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Linglong ComfortMaster
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kosten
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen