57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Linglong ComfortMaster gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Linglong
ComfortMaster
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
4
1
18
3
Optimale Position
#8
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
8.0
12.0
3.3
1.0
6.1
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2025
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
94
111
40
66
47
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
55%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Komfort
Linglong ComfortMaster
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Linglong ComfortMaster
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Trocken
Linglong ComfortMaster
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Linglong ComfortMaster
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kosten
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen