57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Linglong ComfortMaster gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Linglong
ComfortMaster
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
1
18
3
4
Optimale Position
#8
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
8.0
12.0
1.0
6.1
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
94
111
66
47
36
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
55%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Komfort
Linglong ComfortMaster
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Komfort
Linglong ComfortMaster
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Außengeräusch
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trocken
Linglong ComfortMaster
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Linglong ComfortMaster
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kosten
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen