57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
5
4
23
5
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
4.8
3.3
3.3
2.8
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
111
47
158
40
176
139

Nass

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich