58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas E-09 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Mitas
E-09
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
21
4
18
8
4
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
3.3
6.1
5.0
3.8
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
8
165
40
47
146
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas E-09 Firestone Roadhawk GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Firestone Roadhawk 2 Falken e.Ziex %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.