58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas EF-10 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

Testprofil

Mitas
EF-10
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Anzahl der Tests
14
4
18
9
Optimale Position
#8
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
3.3
6.1
5.8
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
1
153
40
47
92

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
84%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
79%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
85%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
86%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
90%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
92%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
87%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
89%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
83%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
84%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
69%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas EF-10 BFGoodrich Advantage GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.