Vergleich: Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Michelin e.Primacy

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Continental UltraContact NXT Premium

3. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Michelin e.Primacy 111

2. Nokian Powerproof 2 91

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 23

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 2x

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 2x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

3. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 6.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

2. Nokian Powerproof 2 10.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

4. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

3. Nokian Powerproof 2 8

4. Michelin e.Primacy 12

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 2026

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 2025

3. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Michelin e.Primacy Sehr gut

3. Continental UltraContact NXT Testsieger

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 Empfohlen

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 Empfohlen

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

3. Michelin e.Primacy Ausreichend

4. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Nokian
Powerproof 2

72%

Michelin
e.Primacy

61%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

57%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 65%

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 42%

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 74%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 62%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 51%

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 84%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 45%

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 86%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 68%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

3. Continental UltraContact NXT A

4. Michelin e.Primacy B

Michelin
e.Primacy

78%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

71%

Nokian
Powerproof 2

61%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

2. Nokian Powerproof 2 69%

3. Continental UltraContact NXT 63%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 63%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 80%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Nokian Powerproof 2 71%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 51%

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 100%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 93%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 87%

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 42%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin
e.Primacy

70%

Nokian
Powerproof 2

66%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

42%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 70%

3. Nokian Powerproof 2 66%

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 42%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

2. Michelin e.Primacy ?

3. Nokian Powerproof 2 ?

4. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

Continental
UltraContact NXT

88%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Nokian
Powerproof 2

84%

Michelin
e.Primacy

67%

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 88%

2. Nokian Powerproof 2 84%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 67%

1. Continental UltraContact NXT A

2. Michelin e.Primacy A

3. Nokian Powerproof 2 B

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B