57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
3
18
4
3
5
Optimale Position
#6
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
9.0
6.1
3.3
3.7
2.8
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
91
47
40
36
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Handling - nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kosten
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen