57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Nokian
WetProof
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
14
18
4
1
6
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
5.6
6.1
3.3
1.0
4.7
Neuester Test
2023
2024
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
47
40
27
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Nokian WetProof
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian WetProof
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian WetProof
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Nassbremsen
Nokian WetProof
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Handling - nass
Nokian WetProof
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian WetProof
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Seitenführung
Nokian WetProof
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Trocken
Nokian WetProof
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian WetProof
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
Nokian WetProof
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian WetProof
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Komfort
Nokian WetProof
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Nokian WetProof
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Nokian WetProof
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Kosten
Nokian WetProof
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian WetProof
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
Nokian WetProof
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian WetProof
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen