Vergleich: Nokian WR C3 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

3. Nokian WR C3 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Michelin e.Primacy 111

2. Falken e.Ziex 34

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

4. Nokian WR C3 23

1. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Nokian WR C3 1x

1. Falken e.Ziex 2.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

4. Nokian WR C3 7.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Nokian WR C3 7.

4. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Nokian WR C3 7

4. Michelin e.Primacy 12

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

4. Nokian WR C3 2018

1. Michelin e.Primacy Sehr gut

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Nokian WR C3 Bedingt empfohlen

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Nokian WR C3 Bedingt empfohlen

4. Michelin e.Primacy Ausreichend

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

Michelin
e.Primacy

60%

Nokian
WR C3

30%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 62%

4. Nokian WR C3 25%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

3. Falken e.Ziex 61%

4. Nokian WR C3 25%

1. Falken e.Ziex 77%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Falken e.Ziex 68%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

2. Falken e.Ziex 69%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Michelin e.Primacy B

3. Nokian WR C3 E

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Nokian
WR C3

97%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

?

Michelin
e.Primacy

?

Falken
e.Ziex

?

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Michelin
e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian
WR C3

61%

1. Falken e.Ziex 81%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Nokian WR C3 53%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 93%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

4. Nokian WR C3 53%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 85%

3. Nokian WR C3 75%

4. Falken e.Ziex 73%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

3. Nokian WR C3 62%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 63%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin
e.Primacy

70%

Nokian
WR C3

66%

1. Nokian WR C3 81%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 70%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. Nokian WR C3 ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Michelin e.Primacy ?

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

Falken
e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin
e.Primacy

67%

Nokian
WR C3

43%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 67%

4. Nokian WR C3 43%

1. Michelin e.Primacy A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Nokian WR C3 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?