Vergleich: Petlas Imperium PT515 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Budget-Reifen

1. Michelin e.Primacy 111

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 11

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 23x

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 5x

3. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 13.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 35.

4. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.35

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Michelin e.Primacy 12

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 24

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2026

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 2021

1. Michelin e.Primacy Sehr gut

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 Testsieger

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Gut

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 Zufriedenstellend

4. Michelin e.Primacy Ausreichend

Continental
PremiumContact 7

85%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Michelin
e.Primacy

59%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

57%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 94%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 62%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 55%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 76%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 66%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 71%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 60%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 30%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Michelin e.Primacy B

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

Continental
PremiumContact 7

92%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin
e.Primacy

71%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

49%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 63%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 63%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 85%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 30%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

74%

Michelin
e.Primacy

70%

1. Petlas Imperium PT515 70%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 70%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 69%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 88%

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 0%

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 ?

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Michelin e.Primacy ?

Michelin
e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

96%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

81%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

70%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 94%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 65%

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 0%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 81%

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 75%

1. Michelin e.Primacy A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 C

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?