57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
5
28
4
4
3
5
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#2
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
2.3
3.3
12.0
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
67
40
111
36
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen