57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
4
5
6
5
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#2
#1
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.3
2.8
4.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
47
40
139
146
63

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich