57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
5
4
5
18
15
3
Optimale Position
#9
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
2.2
6.1
9.0
3.7
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2025
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
40
63
47
226
36

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich