57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
5
4
28
4
5
Optimale Position
#9
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
2.3
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
24
111
67
40
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen