Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Budget

Viking

FourTech Plus

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Testprofil

FourTech Plus

e.Primacy

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

5

4

6

5

28

4

Optimale Position

#9

#3

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

4.7

2.2

2.3

3.3

Neuester Test

2025

2026

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

24

111

146

63

68

40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass

Viking FourTech Plus

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Aquaplaning - längs

Viking FourTech Plus

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Kreisbahn nass

Viking FourTech Plus

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Handling - nass

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Aquaplaning - quer

Viking FourTech Plus

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Nassbremsen

Viking FourTech Plus

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Schnee

Viking FourTech Plus

68%

Kosten

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Kilometerstand

Viking FourTech Plus

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Preis-Wert

Viking FourTech Plus

59%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Rollwiderstand

Viking FourTech Plus

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Komfort

Viking FourTech Plus

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Außengeräusch

Viking FourTech Plus

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Komfort

Viking FourTech Plus

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Trocken

Viking FourTech Plus

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Trockenbremsen

Viking FourTech Plus

53%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Handling - trocken

Viking FourTech Plus

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Winterreifen Beste -Reifen für Elektrofahrzeuge Beste Trockenhandling reifen Beste Regenreifen Reifen mit bestem Handling Die Leisesten reifen Die günstigsten reifen Beste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5

Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Michelin e.Primacy vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Nach Marke durchsuchen

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

FourTech Plus

e.Primacy

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Abmessungen und Preise

Rankings entdecken

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

Auch vergleichen

Nach Marke durchsuchen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen