57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Apollo Aspire XP gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Apollo
Aspire XP
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
9
18
3
4
28
Optimale Position
#4
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
8.6
6.1
3.7
3.3
2.3
Neuester Test
2020
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
51
47
36
40
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Apollo Aspire XP
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Apollo Aspire XP
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Apollo Aspire XP
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Nassbremsen
Apollo Aspire XP
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Apollo Aspire XP
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - nass
Apollo Aspire XP
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Seitenführung
Apollo Aspire XP
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Trocken
Apollo Aspire XP
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
Apollo Aspire XP
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
Apollo Aspire XP
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Apollo Aspire XP
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Kosten
Apollo Aspire XP
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
Apollo Aspire XP
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
Apollo Aspire XP
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preis-Wert
Apollo Aspire XP
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Apollo Aspire XP
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Apollo Aspire XP
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
Apollo Aspire XP
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen