57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
16
4
28
3
4
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#3
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
5.5
12.0
2.3
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2023
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
153
111
67
36
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich