57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
16
4
28
4
1
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
5.5
12.0
2.3
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2023
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
153
111
67
40
66

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Multihawk 2 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcorunGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearNokianFalkenKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenGTMaxxis

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich