57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
5
1
18
13
18
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
2.2
1.0
6.1
4.3
6.1
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2025
2024
2025
2024
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
63
66
47
123
47

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich