57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
4
3
18
5
3
4
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
12.0
3.7
6.1
2.2
1.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2025
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
111
36
47
63
23
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen