58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
21
18
10
5
4
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
11.9
6.1
6.0
2.2
3.8
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2024
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
4
40
165
47
109
63
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Firestone Multihawk GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Firestone Roadhawk Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Kumho Ecsta HS52 Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Falken e.Ziex %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.