57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
21
14
18
13
5
Optimale Position
#2
#8
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
13.4
6.1
4.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
165
153
47
123
63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen