57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
21
4
3
18
28
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
12.0
3.7
6.1
2.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
111
36
47
67

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen