57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
18
1
4
5
3
5
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
1.0
3.3
4.8
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
27
40
158
36
63

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich