57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Firestone Destination HP gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Firestone
Destination HP
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
1
18
3
6
4
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#1
#2
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
2.2
3.0
6.1
3.7
4.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2017
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
63
35
47
36
146
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Offroad
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen