57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
10
18
16
4
3
4
5
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#3
#3
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
6.1
5.5
12.0
3.7
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2023
2025
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
109
47
153
111
36
40
63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen