57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
10
16
18
4
5
3
4
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
5.5
6.1
12.0
2.2
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2023
2024
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
109
153
47
111
63
36
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen