57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
5
28
4
18
1
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
2.2
2.3
3.3
6.1
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2026
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
63
67
40
47
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen