57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
28
18
5
4
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
2.3
6.1
2.2
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
111
67
47
63
40
36

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen